Dan Knauss is the arts and design editor at The New Pantagruel. He also has been or is presently involved in several community enterprises, including the Riverwest Currents, the Riverwest Neighborhood Association, the Riverwest Workers’ Grocery Co-op and Caf?, and the Riverwest Investment Cooperative. Dan was a member of the Partnership Of English Majors long enough to acquire the coveted ABD after long study of fine things like sixteenth-century typography, apocalypse, and polemic.
He has contributed writing to Comment (the journal of the Work Research Foundation), The Matthew?s House Project, The Sixteenth Century Journal: The Journal of Early Modern Studies, the Companion to Pre-1600 British Poetry, and Wikipedia.
Dan and his wife, Sonya, live in Milwaukee and await the home delivery of their fourth daughter.
Neocalvinism is a tradition detached from the broader and longer, western intellectual tradition. It’s detached from its confessional roots, and from a catholic understanding of church. Most of all, it’s detached from ecclesial community. Is it truly a mere publishing project, with a view to variously showing signs of vitality or allowing evangelicals to recover a Christian mind? Neocalvinism . . . Dan Knauss replies, “Just say, ‘No.'”
An email discussion with Stuart Buck (SB), a lawyer and conservative; Daniel Knauss (DK), an urban agrarian; and Caleb Stegall (CS), a country lawyer and upstart hobbit. CS: In the discussion published in the previous issue of Comment, Jeremy Lott defines...
Receive our print magazine and get instant digital access to our current issue and our entire archive. Listen to longform essays, bookmark articles, save your reading location, and more.
